Charlie Brooker’s Newswipe S2E4P2
A look at party political broadcasts and Adam Curtis looks at the influence of Nixon
Related Websites
- Matt Belvedere – Seeking Senior Editorial Position in DC
- Download Frost/Nixon Online | weidman1696346
- Legal News – Your Source for Legal News and Advice | Real Richard Nixon: EARLY YEARS (9) – First Election & World War II
- Nixon reappoints Vicki McCarrell of Pilot Grove to disabilities council | Health Knowledge
- Is it time to dust off the John Cleese election campaign strategy?
- Media Group to Ethiopia: Stop Jamming VOA Broadcasts « Set Political Prisoners Free !
- Bob Hope Auction: Richard Nixon Letter | Careers
- Watch Dad’s in Heaven With Nixon SHOWTIME Special Online Dad’s in Heaven With Nixon Stream Video
- Jay Nixon’s tax credit plan to be aired in House | Political Fix | STLtoday
Anyone know what that flute music at the beginning is?
Richard Mabely of This Morning With Richard & Judy. He was the guy defending Blair in part 1
Do you blindly distrust everything that comes from the mouth of a well-spoken academic?
‘Common sense’ is rather uncommon as far as I can tell. What everyone knows is usually wrong. Are the rich richer? Yes. Are the poor poorer? No. Sorry, that’s reality. We’ve all been lifted, just some more than others.
Was Thatcher a complete loony? Yes. Does that mean she was wrong about everything? No. Does that mean we should be thankful to her? HA! She was a disservice to her own damn party.
What was the name at 3:30?richard something
I don’t know, but it’s flippin’ awful!
the Liberal is Cyril Smith, is that right? And the creepy Labour guy is Gaitskell? It’s been annoying me for a while….
You don’t need a degree from Oxbridge to see how the gap between the rich and the poor (i.e. favouring an elite, something which our highly educated friend seems to be blind to) has ballooned since she was in power and since then with others continuing her economic policy.
Do you blindly trust everything that comes from the mouths of well-spoken academics?
@barrybas So… basicaly, what you’re saying is that people with no background or education in a subject are OBVIOUSLY much better informed about it than the researcher who spent their time looking up information?
omg u cud b the next paxman
That’s, actually, pretty fuckin’ hilarious! Well done.
4:08
simon cowell is going to make my head explode.
@tyjet
Their protection and serving the interests of a wealthy elite make it painfully obvious. No matter what some jumped up apologist says whilst waving an expensive degree certificate around to try and give the air that he knows more about the situation than uneducated peasants like me.
why do politicians lie all the time…..we know they are! Just stop avoiding the question
whats the song at 7:21
Anyone know what the song is at 0.15?
@barrybas
Where did you get your information from? The newspapers? The media?
I think Adam Curtis might know slightly more about the entire situation than you do.
What? Murdoch and Thatcher hates elites? What a load of coblers
1.46 HOLY FUCK!
Even though your ugly Charlie I don’t regret sleeping with you so many times because your so funny
1:45…hunchback of Notre Dame, Go ring the bell and dance with the goonies.
CHARLIE, WILL YOU HAVE MY RABIES?!
Hah. I love Charlie’s look at 0:28.
4:12 what,like the Batphone?
Well if you haven’t seen the screenwipe series, some scenes are repeated here. Oh and like I care what a bunch of non-speaking dimwits think :p
Both series are great though.
Hm, downvoted. Glad to see that everyone is all for freedom of speech. Oh wait, nevermind, he didn’t provide a damn reason.